======The Bystander Effect====== **Materials: **{{$demo.materials_description}}\\ **Difficulty: **{{$demo.difficulty_description}}\\ **Safety: **{{$demo.safety_description}}\\ \\ **Categories:** {{$demo.categories}} \\ **Alternative titles:** Helping Behavior Field Study ====Summary==== {{$demo.summary}} ====Procedure==== - Divide the class into pairs and provide each pair with a standardized data-collection form. - In each observation, one student acts as the performer (dropping a stack of books to simulate needing help) while the other records responses. - Record the day, time, number of observers, and whether observers ignored, watched, or helped. - Conduct five observations per pair, varying the number of bystanders present. - After each observation, explain to observers that it was a class social psychology study, assure them of anonymity, and thank them for participating. - Collect forms, summarize results (percentages of ignore/watch/help under different conditions), and share with the group for discussion. - Compare the group’s findings with known psychological research on the bystander effect and diffusion of responsibility. ====Links==== 📄 The Bystander Effect - Science of Sharing: [[https://www.exploratorium.edu/sites/default/files/pdfs/sos/Activity_10_Bystander_Effect.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com]]\\ ====Variations==== * Change the helping scenario (e.g., asking for directions, appearing lost). * Compare results across different scenarios to see which elicits more help. * Record contextual variables such as gender, age, or ethnicity of observers. * Perform the study in different environments (parks, busy streets, quiet areas) to compare outcomes. ====Safety Precautions==== * Ensure all helping scenarios are safe and do not place students at risk. * Use lightweight, manageable objects when simulating dropped books. * Debrief observers after each trial to avoid prolonged deception. * Respect ethical guidelines when conducting research involving unaware participants. ====Questions to Consider==== * Why was it important to use the same helping scenario across groups? (Consistency avoids confounding variables and makes comparisons valid.) * What other factors besides the number of bystanders might influence helping behavior? (Gender, age, ethnicity, time of day, location, etc.) * Do cultural differences influence willingness to help? Why might this be the case? * Why didn’t we review the bystander effect research before collecting data? (To avoid experimenter bias and demand characteristics.) * What ethical issues arise when deceiving participants in this kind of study? (Informed consent, anonymity, and post-experiment debriefing are critical.)